Clear Communication in Participatory Public Space Design

Authors

  • Azadeh Shojaei UAB, Departament de Traducció i d'Interpretació i d'Estudis de l'Àsia Oriental (DTIEAO)

Keywords:

clear communication, participatory urban planning, inclusive co-design, vulnerable groups

Abstract

Clear communication is a fundamental condition for meaningful participation in urban planning, particularly when engaging vulnerable and marginalised groups that are often excluded from decision-making processes. Rather than focusing solely on simplifying language, this paper conceptualizes clear communication as a holistic and context-sensitive practice that adapts content, formats, tools, and modes of interaction to the diverse cognitive, linguistic, cultural, and digital capacities of participants.

Drawing on interdisciplinary literature across urban planning, participatory design, and communication accessibility, the paper analyses how clear communication shapes inclusive co-design processes in the development of public spaces. The analysis highlights how communication practices influence collaboration, accessibility, shared understanding, and the perceived legitimacy of participatory processes. At the same time, it identifies persistent barriers related to linguistic diversity, literacy, digital exclusion, and structural power asymmetries that continue to constrain equitable participation.

By examining both opportunities and barriers, the paper argues that participation cannot be understood independently of the communicative conditions in which it takes place. Clear communication emerges not as a supplementary accessibility measure, but as a structural component of inclusive participatory urban planning. The findings underline the need to embed communication considerations systematically within participatory methodologies in order to move from symbolic participation toward more substantive and equitable engagement in public space design.

References

Calvo, M., & De Rosa, A. (2017). Design for social sustainability: A reflection on the role of the physical realm in facilitating community co-design. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1705–S1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352694

Carroll, C., Guinan, N., Kinneen, L., Mulheir, D., Loughnane, H., Joyce, O., Higgins, E., Boyle, E., Mullarney, M., & Lyons, R. (2018). Social participation for people with communication disability in coffee shops and restaurants is a human right. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2018.1397748

Collina, L., Galluzzo, L., Borin, A., & Mastrantoni, C. (2022). Co-designing spaces for public service. Designs, 6(2), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6020026

Darcy, S., Maxwell, H., Edwards, M., & Almond, B. (2022). Disability inclusion in beach precincts: A community development approach through a social relational model of disability lens. Sport Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2059998

Elsayed-Ali, S., Bonsignore, E., & Chan, J. (2023). Exploring challenges to inclusion in participatory design. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW1), Article 130. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579496

Gaete Cruz, M., Ersoy, A., Czischke, D., & van Bueren, E. (2022). Towards a framework for urban landscape co-design: Linking the participation ladder and the design cycle. CoDesign, 19(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2022.2123928

Gleeson, B. (2001). Disability and the open city. Urban Studies, 38(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020018574

Gooch, D., Barker, M., Hudson, L., Kelly, R., Kortuem, G., van der Linden, J., Petre, M., Brown, R., Klis-Davies, A., Forbes, H., MacKinnon, J., MacPherson, R., & Walton, C. (2018). Amplifying quiet voices: Challenges and opportunities for participatory design at an urban scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173579

Guridi, J. A., Hwang, A. H.-C., Santo, D., Goula, M., Cheyre, C., Humphreys, L., & Rangel, M. (2024). From fake perfects to conversational imperfects: Exploring image-generative AI as a boundary object for participatory design of public spaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CSCW). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00949

Hatton, A. L., Haslam, C., Bell, S., Langley, J., Woolrych, R., Cory, C., Brownjohn, J. M. W., & Goodwin, V. A. (2020). Innovative solutions to enhance safe and green environments for ageing well using co-design through patient and public involvement. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00223-4

Hilmer, L. (2024). Beyond urban challenges: Virtual reality tools in participatory design processes. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3661455.3669874

Jiménez-Caldera, J., Durango-Severiche, G. Y., Pérez-Arévalo, R., Serrano-Montes, J. L., Rodrigo-Comino, J., & Caballero-Calvo, A. (2024). Methodological proposal for the inclusion of citizen participation in the management and planning of urban public spaces. Cities, 150, Article 105008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105008

Le Dantec, C. A., & DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581

Mehta, V., & Palazzo, D. (2020). Introduction. In V. Mehta & D. Palazzo (Eds.), Companion to public space (1st ed., pp. 1–3). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351002189

Montroy, I., & Matamala, A. (2025). IMMERSE: Learning culture in the language learning classroom through VR. X-Linguae, 18(4), 292–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.18355/xl.2025.18.04.19

Moro, A. (2022). Co-design of public spaces for pedestrian use and soft-mobility in the perspective of communities reappropriation and activation. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.006

Oncins, E., & Orero, P. (2021). Let’s put standardisation in practice: Accessibility services and interaction. Hikma, 20(1), 71–90. https://journals.uco.es/index.php/hikma/article/view/12886/12166

Patrick, M., & McKinnon, I. (2022). Co-creating inclusive public spaces: Learnings from four global case studies on inclusive cities. The Journal of Public Space, 7(2), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v7i2.1500

Pollini, A., Orero, P., & Caforio, A. (2023). Intersectional design in practice: A critical perspective of sustainability for all. DIID – Design, Innovation, Interaction, Design, Digital Special Issue, 1, 366–373. https://www.diid.it/diid/index.php/diid/issue/view/diid-dsi-1/diid-dsi-1

Ricci, L. (2021). Reconquering public spaces by interlinking design, inclusion, and sustainability. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1e0c73c7-8e3a-11eb-b85c-01aa75ed71a1

Solarsh, B., & Johnson, H. (2017). Developing communication access standards to maximize community inclusion for people with communication support needs. Topics in Language Disorders, 37(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000108

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html

United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: 17 goals to transform our world. https://sdgs.un.org/goals

United Nations. (2018). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision—Key facts. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wup/assets/WUP2018-KeyFacts.pdf

Vietrova, P., Vasyliev, P., & Maksymiv, L. (2022). Participatory design method for improvement of urban public spaces: A case study. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Architectura, 21(3), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPA.2022.21.3.18

Wallis, A. K., Westerveld, M. F., & Burton, P. (2022). Ensuring communication-friendly green and public spaces for sustainable cities: SDG 11. Communication Disorders Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2138544

World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42407

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Shojaei, A. (2026). Clear Communication in Participatory Public Space Design. Sphera Publica, 1(26), 162–185. Retrieved from https://sphera.ucam.edu/index.php/sphera-01/article/view/544

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.